Loading…
Global
—
SE
—
pp
0
Accuracy
89.47%
Peak
#1,471,945
Play time
6d 16h
Plays
12,271
Level
83
SS ranks
0
S ranks
1
A ranks
5
How they play
From their 11 best plays (one per map). BPM and length are after rate mods.
Comfort
4.18★
Peak
4.56★
BPM
181
Typical length
1:23
AR range
8.5–9
Mods
NM 91% · HD 9%
Stars: osu!'s own rating with the play's mods for 0 of 11 plays, the no-mod rating for the rest (modded ratings fill in over time). Ranges leave out the top and bottom 10%.
Not enough history yetHistory fills in as snapshots are collected.
Not enough history yetHistory fills in as snapshots are collected.
Skills measured from maps · beta
Map skills: 6 analysed maps this player has passed with 90%+ accuracy (0 with DT/HR/HT, counted at their real difficulty). Plays count by the map's demand, how cleanly it was played and how much of the map tests the skill. Timing accuracy and consistency (misses) use every pass.
Snap aim (jumps)Overall33ahead of 2% of 112 osu! ascent playersbeyond 37% of maps
Flow aimOverall25ahead of 1% of 112 osu! ascent playersbeyond 28% of maps
Wide-angle jumpsOverall20ahead of 1% of 112 osu! ascent playersbeyond 22% of maps
Precision (small circles)Overall15ahead of 1% of 112 osu! ascent playersbeyond 17% of maps
Reading (density)Overall7ahead of 1% of 112 osu! ascent playersbeyond 8% of maps
Accuracy (timing)Overall3ahead of 3% of 116 osu! ascent players
Consistency (misses)Overall0ahead of 0% of 115 osu! ascent players
Measured: what the passed maps contain, and (timing) 300/100/50 counts against each map’s OD windows. Estimated, not from replays. The graph blends two yardsticks: map difficulty (and, for accuracy, every player's passes on osu!) and the other players on osu! ascent, who lean toward higher ranks for now; the player side counts for more as more players join. Compared with 94,547 analysed maps. 5 passes not counted for map skills (under 90%, EZ, or lazer custom rates). They still count for timing accuracy. Map analyzer
Skill profile
Estimated from 11 plays (best per map: top 200, #1s, pinned and recent), strongest weighted most. Updates automatically. Tap a skill to see the evidence.
Strongest: SpeedDeveloping: AccuracyNot enough data: StaminaNot enough data: Reading
Aim / difficulty20
Confidence: Medium11 relevant plays · 11 strong
Measured: 4.22★ weighted star rating
Estimated how: pp-weighted average star rating (with mods) of your plays, scaled 3★ → 0 and 9★ → 100.
Counts as evidence: every play with a star rating.
Limits: Star rating mixes aim and speed; the API's per-map aim/speed split isn't used yet.
Plays that weigh most:
- Ai no Sukima [Light Insane] — 3.95★ · 80pp
- Marshmary [Insane] — 4.41★ · 62pp
- Make a Move (Speed Up Ver.) [Insane] — 4.75★ · 41pp
- Granat [Insane] — 3.89★ · 37pp
- Mizuoto to Curtain [Hyper] — 3.91★ · 34pp
↳ Snap aim ?
↳ Flow aim ?
↳ Wide angles ?
↳ Precision ?
Speed26
Confidence: Medium9 relevant plays · 9 strong
Measured: 181 BPM weighted (after DT/HT)
Estimated how: pp-weighted average BPM of your plays after rate mods, scaled 140 → 0 and 300 → 100.
Counts as evidence: plays at 170+ BPM after rate mods.
Limits: BPM of the song, not of the densest stream; jump maps at high BPM count as 'speed'.
Plays that weigh most:
- Ai no Sukima [Light Insane] — 204 BPM · 80pp
- Marshmary [Insane] — 182 BPM · 62pp
- Make a Move (Speed Up Ver.) [Insane] — 203 BPM · 41pp
- Granat [Insane] — 181 BPM · 37pp
- Mizuoto to Curtain [Hyper] — 186 BPM · 34pp
↳ Tapping ?
↳ Bursts ?
Accuracy0
Confidence: Medium11 relevant plays · 11 strong
Measured: 89.58% weighted accuracy
Estimated how: pp-weighted average accuracy of your plays, scaled 90% → 0 and 100% → 100.
Counts as evidence: every play.
Limits: Doesn't know the map's OD; 98% on OD10 is harder than 98% on OD8.
Plays that weigh most:
- Ai no Sukima [Light Insane] — 98.62% · 80pp
- Marshmary [Insane] — 92.24% · 62pp
- Make a Move (Speed Up Ver.) [Insane] — 86.71% · 41pp
- Granat [Insane] — 93.29% · 37pp
- Mizuoto to Curtain [Hyper] — 93.10% · 34pp
↳ Timing ?
Stamina ?7
Confidence: Low0 relevant plays · 0 strong
Measured: 1m 20s weighted drain length
Estimated how: pp-weighted average drain time of your plays after rate mods, scaled 1 min → 0 and 6 min → 100.
Counts as evidence: plays with 3+ minutes of drain time.
Limits: Length isn't density: a 5-minute map can be mostly breaks.
Too few relevant plays to judge this skill — it may just mean you haven't played many maps like that.
↳ Streams ?
Reading ?51
Confidence: Low3 relevant plays · 3 strong
Measured: AR 8.8 effective · 12% HD
Estimated how: Distance of effective AR from the comfortable ~9.3 (both low and high AR are reading tests) plus the share of Hidden plays.
Counts as evidence: plays at AR 9.7+, AR 8.5 or lower, or with Hidden.
Limits: Can't see pattern complexity, only AR and Hidden.
Too few relevant plays to judge this skill — it may just mean you haven't played many maps like that.
Plays that weigh most:
- Ai no Sukima [Light Insane] — AR 8.8 HD · 80pp
- Mizuoto to Curtain [Hyper] — AR 8.5 · 34pp
- Angel With A Shotgun (Sped Up Ver.) [Insane] — AR 8.0 · 28pp
↳ Reading ?
Consistency5
Confidence: Medium11 relevant plays · 11 strong
Measured: 0% FC (weighted) · 6.6 misses avg
Estimated how: pp-weighted share of full combos (70%) and weighted average misses (30%, 8+ misses → 0).
Counts as evidence: every play.
Limits: Weighted towards a player's best runs, so it overstates day-to-day consistency.
Plays that weigh most:
- Ai no Sukima [Light Insane] — 0 misses · 80pp
- Marshmary [Insane] — 2 misses · 62pp
- Make a Move (Speed Up Ver.) [Insane] — 8 misses · 41pp
- Granat [Insane] — 4 misses · 37pp
- Mizuoto to Curtain [Hyper] — 2 misses · 34pp
↳ Miss rate ?
↳ Steadiness ?
NM 88%HD 12%
Estimates from observable score data, not measurements of ability. History since 2026-11-07. High: 15+ relevant plays among your 50 strongest plays. Medium: 6–14. Low: fewer — the number may just mean you haven't played that kind of map. Methodology