Loading…
Global
#5,398
US
#1,039
pp
10,625
Accuracy
97.20%
Peak
#5,394
Play time
66d 14h
Plays
80,263
Level
101
SS ranks
26
S ranks
568
A ranks
3,147
How they play
From their 6 best plays (one per map). BPM and length are after rate mods.
Comfort
8.05★
Peak
8.05★
BPM
210
Typical length
4:00
AR range
9.7–10.5
Mods
NM 83% · DTHD 17%
Stars: osu!'s own rating with the play's mods for 0 of 6 plays, the no-mod rating for the rest (modded ratings fill in over time). Ranges leave out the top and bottom 10%.
Not enough history yetHistory fills in as snapshots are collected.
Not enough history yetHistory fills in as snapshots are collected.
Skills measured from maps · beta
Map skills: 6 analysed maps this player has passed with 90%+ accuracy (2 with DT/HR/HT, counted at their real difficulty). Plays count by the map's demand, how cleanly it was played and how much of the map tests the skill. Timing accuracy and consistency (misses) use every pass.
Snap aim (jumps)Overall69beyond 69% of maps
Flow aimOverall75beyond 75% of maps
Wide-angle jumpsOverall57beyond 57% of maps
Precision (small circles)Overall25beyond 25% of maps
BurstsOverall78beyond 78% of maps
Reading (density)Overall4beyond 4% of maps
Accuracy (timing)Overall94player ranking fillingmore accurate than 94% of all passes on osu! this week
Measured: what the passed maps contain, and (timing) 300/100/50 counts against each map’s OD windows. Estimated, not from replays. The graph blends two yardsticks: map difficulty (and, for accuracy, every player's passes on osu!) and the other players on osu! ascent, who lean toward higher ranks for now; the player side counts for more as more players join. Compared with 13,051 analysed maps. Map analyzer
Skill profile
Estimated from 6 plays (best per map: top 200, #1s, pinned and recent), strongest weighted most. Updates automatically. Tap a skill to see the evidence.
Strongest: AccuracyDeveloping: ConsistencyNot enough data: StaminaNot enough data: Reading
Aim / difficulty74
Confidence: Medium6 relevant plays · 6 strongTrend: 72 → 74
Measured: 7.46★ weighted star rating
Estimated how: pp-weighted average star rating (with mods) of your plays, scaled 3★ → 0 and 9★ → 100.
Counts as evidence: every play with a star rating.
Limits: Star rating mixes aim and speed; the API's per-map aim/speed split isn't used yet.
Plays that weigh most:
- Yami no Mahou Shoujo [Chaos] — 7.50★ · 485pp
- ROCK-mode [I'm fine, thank you!] — 5.36★ · 482pp
- On the Edge of Paradise [Heavenly Encounter] — 8.05★ · 482pp
- Re:Mobius [Hope Renewed] — 7.42★ · 463pp
- Galaxy in Toybox (DC Update Ver.) [Arles] — 8.43★ · 439pp
↳ Snap aim ?
↳ Flow aim ?
↳ Wide angles ?
↳ Precision ?
Speed51
Confidence: Medium6 relevant plays · 6 strongTrend: 53 → 51
Measured: 222 BPM weighted (after DT/HT)
Estimated how: pp-weighted average BPM of your plays after rate mods, scaled 140 → 0 and 300 → 100.
Counts as evidence: plays at 170+ BPM after rate mods.
Limits: BPM of the song, not of the densest stream; jump maps at high BPM count as 'speed'.
Plays that weigh most:
- Yami no Mahou Shoujo [Chaos] — 200 BPM · 485pp
- ROCK-mode [I'm fine, thank you!] — 270 BPM · 482pp
- On the Edge of Paradise [Heavenly Encounter] — 205 BPM · 482pp
- Re:Mobius [Hope Renewed] — 210 BPM · 463pp
- Galaxy in Toybox (DC Update Ver.) [Arles] — 208 BPM · 439pp
↳ Tapping ?
↳ Bursts ?
Accuracy77
Confidence: Medium6 relevant plays · 6 strongTrend: 78 → 77
Measured: 97.70% weighted accuracy
Estimated how: pp-weighted average accuracy of your plays, scaled 90% → 0 and 100% → 100.
Counts as evidence: every play.
Limits: Doesn't know the map's OD; 98% on OD10 is harder than 98% on OD8.
Plays that weigh most:
- Yami no Mahou Shoujo [Chaos] — 98.99% · 485pp
- ROCK-mode [I'm fine, thank you!] — 96.87% · 482pp
- On the Edge of Paradise [Heavenly Encounter] — 97.78% · 482pp
- Re:Mobius [Hope Renewed] — 99.12% · 463pp
- Galaxy in Toybox (DC Update Ver.) [Arles] — 96.84% · 439pp
↳ Timing ?
Stamina ?55
Confidence: Low4 relevant plays · 4 strongTrend: 53 → 55
Measured: 4m 44s weighted drain length
Estimated how: pp-weighted average drain time of your plays after rate mods, scaled 1 min → 0 and 6 min → 100.
Counts as evidence: plays with 3+ minutes of drain time.
Limits: Length isn't density: a 5-minute map can be mostly breaks.
Too few relevant plays to judge this skill — it may just mean you haven't played many maps like that.
Plays that weigh most:
- On the Edge of Paradise [Heavenly Encounter] — 7:42 drain · 482pp
- Re:Mobius [Hope Renewed] — 4:00 drain · 463pp
- Galaxy in Toybox (DC Update Ver.) [Arles] — 4:07 drain · 439pp
- Everything will freeze [Time Freeze] — 3:14 drain · 424pp
↳ Streams ?
Reading ?50
Confidence: Low5 relevant plays · 5 strongTrend: 51 → 50
Measured: AR 9.9 effective · 18% HD
Estimated how: Distance of effective AR from the comfortable ~9.3 (both low and high AR are reading tests) plus the share of Hidden plays.
Counts as evidence: plays at AR 9.7+, AR 8.5 or lower, or with Hidden.
Limits: Can't see pattern complexity, only AR and Hidden.
Too few relevant plays to judge this skill — it may just mean you haven't played many maps like that.
Plays that weigh most:
- Yami no Mahou Shoujo [Chaos] — AR 9.7 · 485pp
- ROCK-mode [I'm fine, thank you!] — AR 10.5 HD · 482pp
- On the Edge of Paradise [Heavenly Encounter] — AR 9.8 · 482pp
- Galaxy in Toybox (DC Update Ver.) [Arles] — AR 10.0 · 439pp
- Everything will freeze [Time Freeze] — AR 10.0 · 424pp
↳ Reading ?
Consistency2
Confidence: Medium6 relevant plays · 6 strongTrend: 9 → 2
Measured: 0% FC (weighted) · 7.5 misses avg
Estimated how: pp-weighted share of full combos (70%) and weighted average misses (30%, 8+ misses → 0).
Counts as evidence: every play.
Limits: Weighted towards a player's best runs, so it overstates day-to-day consistency.
Plays that weigh most:
- Yami no Mahou Shoujo [Chaos] — 2 misses · 485pp
- ROCK-mode [I'm fine, thank you!] — 1 miss · 482pp
- On the Edge of Paradise [Heavenly Encounter] — 13 misses · 482pp
- Re:Mobius [Hope Renewed] — 3 misses · 463pp
- Galaxy in Toybox (DC Update Ver.) [Arles] — 18 misses · 439pp
↳ Miss rate ?
↳ Steadiness ?
NM 82%DTHD 18%
Estimates from observable score data, not measurements of ability. History since 2026-09-29. High: 15+ relevant plays among your 50 strongest plays. Medium: 6–14. Low: fewer — the number may just mean you haven't played that kind of map. Methodology