Loading…
Global
#131
RU
#11
pp
18,194
Accuracy
95.67%
Peak
#113
Play time
102d 5h
Plays
230,986
Level
102
SS ranks
58
S ranks
614
A ranks
1,604
How they play
From their 5 best plays (one per map). BPM and length are after rate mods.
Comfort
6.19★
Peak
6.19★
BPM
300
Typical length
2:05
AR range
10.3–10.6
Mods
DTHD 100%
Stars: osu!'s own rating with the play's mods for 2 of 5 plays, the no-mod rating for the rest (modded ratings fill in over time). Ranges leave out the top and bottom 10%.
Not enough history yetHistory fills in as snapshots are collected.
Not enough history yetHistory fills in as snapshots are collected.
Skills measured from maps · beta
Map skills: 4 analysed maps this player has passed with 90%+ accuracy (4 with DT/HR/HT, counted at their real difficulty). Plays count by the map's demand, how cleanly it was played and how much of the map tests the skill. Timing accuracy and consistency (misses) use every pass.
Accuracy (timing)Overall83player ranking fillingmore accurate than 83% of all passes on osu! this week
Consistency (misses)Overall–player ranking filling
Measured: what the passed maps contain, and (timing) 300/100/50 counts against each map’s OD windows. Estimated, not from replays. The graph blends two yardsticks: map difficulty (and, for accuracy, every player's passes on osu!) and the other players on osu! ascent, who lean toward higher ranks for now; the player side counts for more as more players join. Compared with 15,833 analysed maps. Map analyzer
Skill profile
Estimated from 5 plays (best per map: top 200, #1s, pinned and recent), strongest weighted most. Updates automatically. Tap a skill to see the evidence.
Not enough data: Aim / difficultyNot enough data: SpeedNot enough data: AccuracyNot enough data: StaminaNot enough data: ReadingNot enough data: Consistency
Aim / difficulty ?52
Confidence: Low5 relevant plays · 5 strongTrend: 52 → 52 → 52 → 52
Measured: 6.11★ weighted star rating
Estimated how: pp-weighted average star rating (with mods) of your plays, scaled 3★ → 0 and 9★ → 100.
Counts as evidence: every play with a star rating.
Limits: Star rating mixes aim and speed; the API's per-map aim/speed split isn't used yet.
Too few relevant plays to judge this skill — it may just mean you haven't played many maps like that.
Plays that weigh most:
- Tokyo Teddy Bear [Extreme] — 6.95★ · 641pp
- Tokyo Teddy Bear [Alpaca's Expert] — 6.19★ · 484pp
- ARE WE FLOATING IN SPACE [CELLINA'S EXTRA] — 5.50★ · 468pp
- Uso no Hibana [NiNo's Extra] — 6.10★ · 421pp
- Go Beyond!! [Expert!!] — 5.69★ · 410pp
↳ Snap aim ?
↳ Flow aim ?
↳ Wide angles ?
↳ Precision ?
Speed ?96
Confidence: Low5 relevant plays · 5 strongTrend: 96 → 96 → 96 → 96
Measured: 294 BPM weighted (after DT/HT)
Estimated how: pp-weighted average BPM of your plays after rate mods, scaled 140 → 0 and 300 → 100.
Counts as evidence: plays at 170+ BPM after rate mods.
Limits: BPM of the song, not of the densest stream; jump maps at high BPM count as 'speed'.
Too few relevant plays to judge this skill — it may just mean you haven't played many maps like that.
Plays that weigh most:
- Tokyo Teddy Bear [Extreme] — 300 BPM · 641pp
- Tokyo Teddy Bear [Alpaca's Expert] — 300 BPM · 484pp
- ARE WE FLOATING IN SPACE [CELLINA'S EXTRA] — 285 BPM · 468pp
- Uso no Hibana [NiNo's Extra] — 282 BPM · 421pp
- Go Beyond!! [Expert!!] — 300 BPM · 410pp
↳ Tapping ?
↳ Bursts ?
Accuracy ?52
Confidence: Low5 relevant plays · 5 strongTrend: 52 → 52 → 52 → 52
Measured: 95.18% weighted accuracy
Estimated how: pp-weighted average accuracy of your plays, scaled 90% → 0 and 100% → 100.
Counts as evidence: every play.
Limits: Doesn't know the map's OD; 98% on OD10 is harder than 98% on OD8.
Too few relevant plays to judge this skill — it may just mean you haven't played many maps like that.
Plays that weigh most:
- Tokyo Teddy Bear [Extreme] — 94.87% · 641pp
- Tokyo Teddy Bear [Alpaca's Expert] — 95.36% · 484pp
- ARE WE FLOATING IN SPACE [CELLINA'S EXTRA] — 94.42% · 468pp
- Uso no Hibana [NiNo's Extra] — 95.40% · 421pp
- Go Beyond!! [Expert!!] — 95.96% · 410pp
↳ Timing ?
Stamina ?18
Confidence: Low0 relevant plays · 0 strongTrend: 18 → 18 → 18 → 18
Measured: 2m 55s weighted drain length
Estimated how: pp-weighted average drain time of your plays after rate mods, scaled 1 min → 0 and 6 min → 100.
Counts as evidence: plays with 3+ minutes of drain time.
Limits: Length isn't density: a 5-minute map can be mostly breaks.
Too few relevant plays to judge this skill — it may just mean you haven't played many maps like that.
↳ Streams ?
Reading ?67
Confidence: Low5 relevant plays · 5 strongTrend: 67 → 67 → 67 → 67
Measured: AR 10.5 effective · 100% HD
Estimated how: Distance of effective AR from the comfortable ~9.3 (both low and high AR are reading tests) plus the share of Hidden plays.
Counts as evidence: plays at AR 9.7+, AR 8.5 or lower, or with Hidden.
Limits: Can't see pattern complexity, only AR and Hidden.
Too few relevant plays to judge this skill — it may just mean you haven't played many maps like that.
Plays that weigh most:
- Tokyo Teddy Bear [Extreme] — AR 10.6 HD · 641pp
- Tokyo Teddy Bear [Alpaca's Expert] — AR 10.5 HD · 484pp
- ARE WE FLOATING IN SPACE [CELLINA'S EXTRA] — AR 10.3 HD · 468pp
- Uso no Hibana [NiNo's Extra] — AR 10.6 HD · 421pp
- Go Beyond!! [Expert!!] — AR 10.5 HD · 410pp
↳ Reading ?
Consistency ?0
Confidence: Low5 relevant plays · 5 strongTrend: 0 → 0 → 0 → 0
Measured: 0% FC (weighted) · 8.9 misses avg
Estimated how: pp-weighted share of full combos (70%) and weighted average misses (30%, 8+ misses → 0).
Counts as evidence: every play.
Limits: Weighted towards a player's best runs, so it overstates day-to-day consistency.
Too few relevant plays to judge this skill — it may just mean you haven't played many maps like that.
Plays that weigh most:
- Tokyo Teddy Bear [Extreme] — 12 misses · 641pp
- Tokyo Teddy Bear [Alpaca's Expert] — 8 misses · 484pp
- ARE WE FLOATING IN SPACE [CELLINA'S EXTRA] — 6 misses · 468pp
- Uso no Hibana [NiNo's Extra] — 12 misses · 421pp
- Go Beyond!! [Expert!!] — 6 misses · 410pp
↳ Miss rate ?
↳ Steadiness ?
DTHD 100%
Estimates from observable score data, not measurements of ability. History since 2026-09-28. High: 15+ relevant plays among your 50 strongest plays. Medium: 6–14. Low: fewer — the number may just mean you haven't played that kind of map. Methodology