Loading…
Global
#3,681
NL
#45
pp
11,340
Accuracy
98.25%
Peak
#3,679
Play time
99d 15h
Plays
203,705
Level
103
SS ranks
16
S ranks
433
A ranks
3,200
How they play
From their 12 best plays (one per map). BPM and length are after rate mods.
Comfort
5.67★
Peak
7.89★
BPM
270
Typical length
0:59
AR range
10.4–11
Mods
DTHD 83% · DTHDHR 17%
Stars: osu!'s own rating with the play's mods for 4 of 12 plays, the no-mod rating for the rest (modded ratings fill in over time). Ranges leave out the top and bottom 10%.
Not enough history yetHistory fills in as snapshots are collected.
Not enough history yetHistory fills in as snapshots are collected.
Skills measured from maps · beta
Map skills: 8 analysed maps this player has passed with 90%+ accuracy (8 with DT/HR/HT, counted at their real difficulty). Plays count by the map's demand, how cleanly it was played and how much of the map tests the skill. Timing accuracy and consistency (misses) use every pass.
Snap aim (jumps)Overall88beyond 88% of maps
Flow aimOverall80beyond 80% of maps
Wide-angle jumpsOverall4beyond 4% of maps
Precision (small circles)Overall27beyond 27% of maps
BurstsOverall31beyond 31% of maps
Reading (density)Overall1beyond 1% of maps
Accuracy (timing)Overall86player ranking fillingmore accurate than 86% of all passes on osu! this week
Measured: what the passed maps contain, and (timing) 300/100/50 counts against each map’s OD windows. Estimated, not from replays. The graph blends two yardsticks: map difficulty (and, for accuracy, every player's passes on osu!) and the other players on osu! ascent, who lean toward higher ranks for now; the player side counts for more as more players join. Compared with 15,803 analysed maps. Map analyzer
Skill profile
Estimated from 12 plays (best per map: top 200, #1s, pinned and recent), strongest weighted most. Updates automatically. Tap a skill to see the evidence.
Strongest: AccuracyDeveloping: ConsistencyNot enough data: Stamina
Aim / difficulty40
Confidence: Medium12 relevant plays · 12 strongTrend: 42 → 41 → 40 → 40
Measured: 5.43★ weighted star rating
Estimated how: pp-weighted average star rating (with mods) of your plays, scaled 3★ → 0 and 9★ → 100.
Counts as evidence: every play with a star rating.
Limits: Star rating mixes aim and speed; the API's per-map aim/speed split isn't used yet.
Plays that weigh most:
- sad child (nightcore & cut ver.) [alone] — 5.26★ · 524pp
- UNION!! [UNITY!!] — 5.34★ · 490pp
- sad child (nightcore & cut ver.) [kumocha's expert] — 5.03★ · 463pp
- JUSTadICE (TV Size) [Extreme] — 5.95★ · 457pp
- Everything Sucks (Cut Ver.) [Misery] — 5.42★ · 445pp
↳ Snap aim ?
↳ Flow aim ?
↳ Wide angles ?
↳ Precision ?
Speed83
Confidence: Medium12 relevant plays · 12 strongTrend: 83 → 84 → 83 → 83
Measured: 272 BPM weighted (after DT/HT)
Estimated how: pp-weighted average BPM of your plays after rate mods, scaled 140 → 0 and 300 → 100.
Counts as evidence: plays at 170+ BPM after rate mods.
Limits: BPM of the song, not of the densest stream; jump maps at high BPM count as 'speed'.
Plays that weigh most:
- sad child (nightcore & cut ver.) [alone] — 270 BPM · 524pp
- UNION!! [UNITY!!] — 258 BPM · 490pp
- sad child (nightcore & cut ver.) [kumocha's expert] — 270 BPM · 463pp
- JUSTadICE (TV Size) [Extreme] — 278 BPM · 457pp
- Everything Sucks (Cut Ver.) [Misery] — 267 BPM · 445pp
↳ Tapping ?
↳ Bursts ?
Accuracy86
Confidence: Medium12 relevant plays · 12 strongTrend: 57 → 62 → 63 → 63
Score: 86, the average rank of its sub-skills measured from maps (see “Skills measured from maps”). The play-style estimate below was 63.
Measured: 96.29% weighted accuracy
Estimated how: pp-weighted average accuracy of your plays, scaled 90% → 0 and 100% → 100.
Counts as evidence: every play.
Limits: Doesn't know the map's OD; 98% on OD10 is harder than 98% on OD8.
Plays that weigh most:
- sad child (nightcore & cut ver.) [alone] — 95.64% · 524pp
- UNION!! [UNITY!!] — 98.22% · 490pp
- sad child (nightcore & cut ver.) [kumocha's expert] — 99.37% · 463pp
- JUSTadICE (TV Size) [Extreme] — 92.74% · 457pp
- Everything Sucks (Cut Ver.) [Misery] — 98.04% · 445pp
↳ Timing
Stamina ?1
Confidence: Low1 relevant plays · 1 strongTrend: 0 → 3 → 1 → 1
Measured: 1m 4s weighted drain length
Estimated how: pp-weighted average drain time of your plays after rate mods, scaled 1 min → 0 and 6 min → 100.
Counts as evidence: plays with 3+ minutes of drain time.
Limits: Length isn't density: a 5-minute map can be mostly breaks.
Too few relevant plays to judge this skill — it may just mean you haven't played many maps like that.
Plays that weigh most:
- UNION!! [UNITY!!] — 3:34 drain · 490pp
↳ Streams ?
Reading66
Confidence: Medium12 relevant plays · 12 strongTrend: 62 → 64 → 66 → 66
Measured: AR 10.6 effective · 100% HD
Estimated how: Distance of effective AR from the comfortable ~9.3 (both low and high AR are reading tests) plus the share of Hidden plays.
Counts as evidence: plays at AR 9.7+, AR 8.5 or lower, or with Hidden.
Limits: Can't see pattern complexity, only AR and Hidden.
Plays that weigh most:
- sad child (nightcore & cut ver.) [alone] — AR 11.0 HD · 524pp
- UNION!! [UNITY!!] — AR 10.4 HD · 490pp
- sad child (nightcore & cut ver.) [kumocha's expert] — AR 10.5 HD · 463pp
- JUSTadICE (TV Size) [Extreme] — AR 10.5 HD · 457pp
- Everything Sucks (Cut Ver.) [Misery] — AR 10.5 HD · 445pp
↳ Reading ?
Consistency28
Confidence: Medium12 relevant plays · 12 strongTrend: 20 → 19 → 28 → 28
Measured: 10% FC (weighted) · 2.4 misses avg
Estimated how: pp-weighted share of full combos (70%) and weighted average misses (30%, 8+ misses → 0).
Counts as evidence: every play.
Limits: Weighted towards a player's best runs, so it overstates day-to-day consistency.
Plays that weigh most:
- sad child (nightcore & cut ver.) [alone] — 1 miss · 524pp
- UNION!! [UNITY!!] — 5 misses · 490pp
- sad child (nightcore & cut ver.) [kumocha's expert] — FC · 463pp
- JUSTadICE (TV Size) [Extreme] — 3 misses · 457pp
- Everything Sucks (Cut Ver.) [Misery] — 2 misses · 445pp
↳ Miss rate ?
↳ Steadiness ?
DTHD 81%HRDTHD 19%
Estimates from observable score data, not measurements of ability. History since 2026-09-28. High: 15+ relevant plays among your 50 strongest plays. Medium: 6–14. Low: fewer — the number may just mean you haven't played that kind of map. Methodology