Loading…
Global
#13,493
KR
#380
pp
8,978
Accuracy
98.98%
Peak
#1,942
Play time
72d 2h
Plays
112,721
Level
102
SS ranks
354
S ranks
1,301
A ranks
1,112
How they play
From their 9 best plays (one per map). BPM and length are after rate mods.
Comfort
6.89★
Peak
7.41★
BPM
203
Typical length
2:54
AR range
9.5–9.7
Mods
NM 56% · DTHD 33% · DT 11%
Stars: osu!'s own rating with the play's mods for 0 of 9 plays, the no-mod rating for the rest (modded ratings fill in over time). Ranges leave out the top and bottom 10%.
Not enough history yetHistory fills in as snapshots are collected.
Not enough history yetHistory fills in as snapshots are collected.
Skills measured from maps · beta
Map skills: 6 analysed maps this player has passed with 90%+ accuracy (4 with DT/HR/HT, counted at their real difficulty). Plays count by the map's demand, how cleanly it was played and how much of the map tests the skill. Timing accuracy and consistency (misses) use every pass.
Snap aim (jumps)Overall46beyond 46% of maps
Flow aimOverall39beyond 39% of maps
Wide-angle jumpsOverall36beyond 36% of maps
Precision (small circles)Overall38beyond 38% of maps
Tapping speedOverall92beyond 92% of maps
Stamina (long streams)Overall61beyond 61% of maps
BurstsOverall83beyond 83% of maps
Reading (density)Overall34beyond 34% of maps
Accuracy (timing)Overall96player ranking fillingmore accurate than 96% of all passes on osu! this week
Consistency (misses)Overall–player ranking filling
Measured: what the passed maps contain, and (timing) 300/100/50 counts against each map’s OD windows. Estimated, not from replays. The graph blends two yardsticks: map difficulty (and, for accuracy, every player's passes on osu!) and the other players on osu! ascent, who lean toward higher ranks for now; the player side counts for more as more players join. Compared with 12,503 analysed maps. Map analyzer
Skill profile
Estimated from 9 plays (best per map: top 200, #1s, pinned and recent), strongest weighted most. Updates automatically. Tap a skill to see the evidence.
Strongest: AccuracyDeveloping: SpeedNot enough data: Stamina
Aim / difficulty51
Confidence: Medium9 relevant plays · 9 strongTrend: 57 → 58 → 51
Measured: 6.05★ weighted star rating
Estimated how: pp-weighted average star rating (with mods) of your plays, scaled 3★ → 0 and 9★ → 100.
Counts as evidence: every play with a star rating.
Limits: Star rating mixes aim and speed; the API's per-map aim/speed split isn't used yet.
Plays that weigh most:
- Daidai Genome [Love] — 4.74★ · 467pp
- VIRGIN CODE [Memoirs] — 7.43★ · 438pp
- Daidai Genome [Tights] — 4.58★ · 434pp
- BRIGHTEST HEART [Insane] — 4.72★ · 427pp
- Kasou no Kimi no Miyako [Imagination] — 4.83★ · 426pp
↳ Snap aim ?
↳ Flow aim ?
↳ Wide angles ?
↳ Precision ?
Speed41
Confidence: Medium9 relevant plays · 9 strongTrend: 41 → 40 → 41
Measured: 206 BPM weighted (after DT/HT)
Estimated how: pp-weighted average BPM of your plays after rate mods, scaled 140 → 0 and 300 → 100.
Counts as evidence: plays at 170+ BPM after rate mods.
Limits: BPM of the song, not of the densest stream; jump maps at high BPM count as 'speed'.
Plays that weigh most:
- Daidai Genome [Love] — 203 BPM · 467pp
- VIRGIN CODE [Memoirs] — 212 BPM · 438pp
- Daidai Genome [Tights] — 203 BPM · 434pp
- BRIGHTEST HEART [Insane] — 215 BPM · 427pp
- Kasou no Kimi no Miyako [Imagination] — 210 BPM · 426pp
↳ Tapping ?
↳ Bursts ?
Accuracy85
Confidence: Medium9 relevant plays · 9 strongTrend: 86 → 87 → 85
Measured: 98.53% weighted accuracy
Estimated how: pp-weighted average accuracy of your plays, scaled 90% → 0 and 100% → 100.
Counts as evidence: every play.
Limits: Doesn't know the map's OD; 98% on OD10 is harder than 98% on OD8.
Plays that weigh most:
- Daidai Genome [Love] — 98.81% · 467pp
- VIRGIN CODE [Memoirs] — 98.11% · 438pp
- Daidai Genome [Tights] — 98.99% · 434pp
- BRIGHTEST HEART [Insane] — 98.50% · 427pp
- Kasou no Kimi no Miyako [Imagination] — 97.43% · 426pp
↳ Timing ?
Stamina ?50
Confidence: Low4 relevant plays · 4 strongTrend: 57 → 55 → 50
Measured: 3m 29s weighted drain length
Estimated how: pp-weighted average drain time of your plays after rate mods, scaled 1 min → 0 and 6 min → 100.
Counts as evidence: plays with 3+ minutes of drain time.
Limits: Length isn't density: a 5-minute map can be mostly breaks.
Too few relevant plays to judge this skill — it may just mean you haven't played many maps like that.
Plays that weigh most:
- VIRGIN CODE [Memoirs] — 5:24 drain · 438pp
- Core of Spark [Luminous] — 5:50 drain · 424pp
- Gimme chocolate!! [BLACK CHOCOLATE!!] — 3:48 drain · 422pp
- -ERROR [*@#*%] — 3:43 drain · 415pp
↳ Streams ?
Reading65
Confidence: Medium6 relevant plays · 6 strongTrend: 63 → 62 → 65
Measured: AR 9.7 effective · 37% HD
Estimated how: Distance of effective AR from the comfortable ~9.3 (both low and high AR are reading tests) plus the share of Hidden plays.
Counts as evidence: plays at AR 9.7+, AR 8.5 or lower, or with Hidden.
Limits: Can't see pattern complexity, only AR and Hidden.
Plays that weigh most:
- Daidai Genome [Love] — AR 9.7 HD · 467pp
- VIRGIN CODE [Memoirs] — AR 9.7 · 438pp
- Daidai Genome [Tights] — AR 10.0 HD · 434pp
- BRIGHTEST HEART [Insane] — AR 9.7 HD · 427pp
- Core of Spark [Luminous] — AR 9.7 · 424pp
↳ Reading ?
Consistency48
Confidence: Medium9 relevant plays · 9 strongTrend: 44 → 42 → 48
Measured: 37% FC (weighted) · 2.2 misses avg
Estimated how: pp-weighted share of full combos (70%) and weighted average misses (30%, 8+ misses → 0).
Counts as evidence: every play.
Limits: Weighted towards a player's best runs, so it overstates day-to-day consistency.
Plays that weigh most:
- Daidai Genome [Love] — FC · 467pp
- VIRGIN CODE [Memoirs] — 4 misses · 438pp
- Daidai Genome [Tights] — FC · 434pp
- BRIGHTEST HEART [Insane] — 1 miss · 427pp
- Kasou no Kimi no Miyako [Imagination] — FC · 426pp
↳ Miss rate ?
↳ Steadiness ?
NM 52%DTHD 37%DT 11%
Estimates from observable score data, not measurements of ability. History since 2026-09-28. High: 15+ relevant plays among your 50 strongest plays. Medium: 6–14. Low: fewer — the number may just mean you haven't played that kind of map. Methodology