Loading…
Global
#893
AU
#28
pp
14,086
Accuracy
98.61%
Peak
#892
Play time
117d 20h
Plays
189,836
Level
105
SS ranks
27
S ranks
804
A ranks
2,589
How they play
From their 8 best plays (one per map). BPM and length are after rate mods.
Comfort
7.37★
Peak
7.75★
BPM
190
Typical length
4:37
AR range
10–10
Mods
HR 50% · NM 25% · DTHD 13% · HDHR 13%
Stars: osu!'s own rating with the play's mods for 1 of 8 plays, the no-mod rating for the rest (modded ratings fill in over time). Ranges leave out the top and bottom 10%.
Not enough history yetHistory fills in as snapshots are collected.
Not enough history yetHistory fills in as snapshots are collected.
Skills measured from maps · beta
Map skills: 6 analysed maps this player has passed with 90%+ accuracy (4 with DT/HR/HT, counted at their real difficulty). Plays count by the map's demand, how cleanly it was played and how much of the map tests the skill. Timing accuracy and consistency (misses) use every pass.
Snap aim (jumps)Overall50beyond 50% of maps
Flow aimOverall68beyond 68% of maps
Wide-angle jumpsOverall35beyond 35% of maps
Precision (small circles)Overall24beyond 24% of maps
BurstsOverall54beyond 54% of maps
Reading (density)Overall4beyond 4% of maps
Accuracy (timing)Overall96player ranking fillingmore accurate than 96% of all passes on osu! this week
Measured: what the passed maps contain, and (timing) 300/100/50 counts against each map’s OD windows. Estimated, not from replays. The graph blends two yardsticks: map difficulty (and, for accuracy, every player's passes on osu!) and the other players on osu! ascent, who lean toward higher ranks for now; the player side counts for more as more players join. Compared with 11,653 analysed maps. Map analyzer
Skill profile
Estimated from 8 plays (best per map: top 200, #1s, pinned and recent), strongest weighted most. Updates automatically. Tap a skill to see the evidence.
Strongest: AccuracyDeveloping: Consistency
Aim / difficulty69
Confidence: Medium8 relevant plays · 8 strongTrend: 73 → 69
Measured: 7.12★ weighted star rating
Estimated how: pp-weighted average star rating (with mods) of your plays, scaled 3★ → 0 and 9★ → 100.
Counts as evidence: every play with a star rating.
Limits: Star rating mixes aim and speed; the API's per-map aim/speed split isn't used yet.
Plays that weigh most:
- Fly With Me [Reaching Destiny] — 7.03★ · 689pp
- Epitaph [Remembrance] — 7.36★ · 627pp
- Heartless (Cut Ver.) [Indifference] — 7.19★ · 612pp
- HEAVENLY PUNISHMENT [ETERNAL DAMNATION] — 7.75★ · 576pp
- Snow halation [Snowfall] — 5.78★ · 493pp
↳ Snap aim ?
↳ Flow aim ?
↳ Wide angles ?
↳ Precision ?
Speed38
Confidence: Medium8 relevant plays · 8 strongTrend: 36 → 38
Measured: 201 BPM weighted (after DT/HT)
Estimated how: pp-weighted average BPM of your plays after rate mods, scaled 140 → 0 and 300 → 100.
Counts as evidence: plays at 170+ BPM after rate mods.
Limits: BPM of the song, not of the densest stream; jump maps at high BPM count as 'speed'.
Plays that weigh most:
- Fly With Me [Reaching Destiny] — 180 BPM · 689pp
- Epitaph [Remembrance] — 191 BPM · 627pp
- Heartless (Cut Ver.) [Indifference] — 190 BPM · 612pp
- HEAVENLY PUNISHMENT [ETERNAL DAMNATION] — 184 BPM · 576pp
- Snow halation [Snowfall] — 260 BPM · 493pp
↳ Tapping ?
↳ Bursts ?
Accuracy82
Confidence: Medium8 relevant plays · 8 strongTrend: 84 → 82
Measured: 98.23% weighted accuracy
Estimated how: pp-weighted average accuracy of your plays, scaled 90% → 0 and 100% → 100.
Counts as evidence: every play.
Limits: Doesn't know the map's OD; 98% on OD10 is harder than 98% on OD8.
Plays that weigh most:
- Fly With Me [Reaching Destiny] — 98.60% · 689pp
- Epitaph [Remembrance] — 98.43% · 627pp
- Heartless (Cut Ver.) [Indifference] — 99.53% · 612pp
- HEAVENLY PUNISHMENT [ETERNAL DAMNATION] — 97.89% · 576pp
- Snow halation [Snowfall] — 96.72% · 493pp
↳ Timing ?
Stamina63
Confidence: Medium6 relevant plays · 6 strongTrend: 59 → 63
Measured: 4m 9s weighted drain length
Estimated how: pp-weighted average drain time of your plays after rate mods, scaled 1 min → 0 and 6 min → 100.
Counts as evidence: plays with 3+ minutes of drain time.
Limits: Length isn't density: a 5-minute map can be mostly breaks.
Plays that weigh most:
- Fly With Me [Reaching Destiny] — 4:46 drain · 689pp
- Epitaph [Remembrance] — 5:35 drain · 627pp
- HEAVENLY PUNISHMENT [ETERNAL DAMNATION] — 5:52 drain · 576pp
- humanly [humanly] — 3:23 drain · 485pp
- Eien no Tsurugi [Under the Blue Sky, We Strive to Overcome Difficult Challenges] — 4:37 drain · 444pp
↳ Streams ?
Reading50
Confidence: Medium7 relevant plays · 7 strongTrend: 50 → 50
Measured: AR 10.0 effective · 22% HD
Estimated how: Distance of effective AR from the comfortable ~9.3 (both low and high AR are reading tests) plus the share of Hidden plays.
Counts as evidence: plays at AR 9.7+, AR 8.5 or lower, or with Hidden.
Limits: Can't see pattern complexity, only AR and Hidden.
Plays that weigh most:
- Fly With Me [Reaching Destiny] — AR 10.0 · 689pp
- Epitaph [Remembrance] — AR 10.0 · 627pp
- Heartless (Cut Ver.) [Indifference] — AR 10.0 · 612pp
- Snow halation [Snowfall] — AR 10.5 HD · 493pp
- humanly [humanly] — AR 10.0 · 485pp
↳ Reading ?
Consistency21
Confidence: Medium8 relevant plays · 8 strongTrend: 6 → 21
Measured: 15% FC (weighted) · 5.1 misses avg
Estimated how: pp-weighted share of full combos (70%) and weighted average misses (30%, 8+ misses → 0).
Counts as evidence: every play.
Limits: Weighted towards a player's best runs, so it overstates day-to-day consistency.
Plays that weigh most:
- Fly With Me [Reaching Destiny] — FC · 689pp
- Epitaph [Remembrance] — 3 misses · 627pp
- Heartless (Cut Ver.) [Indifference] — 1 miss · 612pp
- HEAVENLY PUNISHMENT [ETERNAL DAMNATION] — 3 misses · 576pp
- Snow halation [Snowfall] — 8 misses · 493pp
↳ Miss rate ?
↳ Steadiness ?
HR 53%NM 24%DTHD 12%HRHD 10%
Estimates from observable score data, not measurements of ability. History since 2026-09-28. High: 15+ relevant plays among your 50 strongest plays. Medium: 6–14. Low: fewer — the number may just mean you haven't played that kind of map. Methodology