Loading…
Global
#3,584
NL
#44
pp
11,390
Accuracy
98.29%
Peak
#621
Play time
109d 6h
Plays
163,452
Level
103
SS ranks
99
S ranks
2,130
A ranks
4,827
How they play
From their 8 best plays (one per map). BPM and length are after rate mods.
Comfort
5.63★
Peak
7.42★
BPM
270
Typical length
2:42
AR range
9.7–10.5
Mods
DTHD 38% · DT 38% · NM 25%
Stars: osu!'s own rating with the play's mods for 1 of 8 plays, the no-mod rating for the rest (modded ratings fill in over time). Ranges leave out the top and bottom 10%.
Not enough history yetHistory fills in as snapshots are collected.
Not enough history yetHistory fills in as snapshots are collected.
Skills measured from maps · beta
Map skills: 5 analysed maps this player has passed with 90%+ accuracy (4 with DT/HR/HT, counted at their real difficulty). Plays count by the map's demand, how cleanly it was played and how much of the map tests the skill. Timing accuracy and consistency (misses) use every pass.
Snap aim (jumps)Overall72beyond 72% of maps
Flow aimOverall75beyond 75% of maps
Wide-angle jumpsOverall57beyond 57% of maps
Precision (small circles)Overall8beyond 8% of maps
BurstsOverall29beyond 29% of maps
Reading (density)Overall4beyond 4% of maps
Accuracy (timing)Overall95player ranking fillingmore accurate than 95% of all passes on osu! this week
Measured: what the passed maps contain, and (timing) 300/100/50 counts against each map’s OD windows. Estimated, not from replays. The graph blends two yardsticks: map difficulty (and, for accuracy, every player's passes on osu!) and the other players on osu! ascent, who lean toward higher ranks for now; the player side counts for more as more players join. Compared with 13,041 analysed maps. Map analyzer
Skill profile
Estimated from 8 plays (best per map: top 200, #1s, pinned and recent), strongest weighted most. Updates automatically. Tap a skill to see the evidence.
Strongest: AccuracyDeveloping: ConsistencyNot enough data: Stamina
Aim / difficulty50
Confidence: Medium8 relevant plays · 8 strongTrend: 56 → 50
Measured: 5.97★ weighted star rating
Estimated how: pp-weighted average star rating (with mods) of your plays, scaled 3★ → 0 and 9★ → 100.
Counts as evidence: every play with a star rating.
Limits: Star rating mixes aim and speed; the API's per-map aim/speed split isn't used yet.
Plays that weigh most:
- I'll Sleep When I'm Dead [Onlybiscuit's Extreme] — 5.54★ · 531pp
- You Suck At Love (Nightcore & Cut Ver.) [Ram's Extra] — 5.34★ · 530pp
- -ERROR [*@#*%] — 7.67★ · 500pp
- Manima ni [('(oo)')] — 5.04★ · 496pp
- Re:Mobius [Hope Renewed] — 7.42★ · 439pp
↳ Snap aim ?
↳ Flow aim ?
↳ Wide angles ?
↳ Precision ?
Speed75
Confidence: Medium8 relevant plays · 8 strongTrend: 72 → 75
Measured: 261 BPM weighted (after DT/HT)
Estimated how: pp-weighted average BPM of your plays after rate mods, scaled 140 → 0 and 300 → 100.
Counts as evidence: plays at 170+ BPM after rate mods.
Limits: BPM of the song, not of the densest stream; jump maps at high BPM count as 'speed'.
Plays that weigh most:
- I'll Sleep When I'm Dead [Onlybiscuit's Extreme] — 255 BPM · 531pp
- You Suck At Love (Nightcore & Cut Ver.) [Ram's Extra] — 270 BPM · 530pp
- -ERROR [*@#*%] — 200 BPM · 500pp
- Manima ni [('(oo)')] — 278 BPM · 496pp
- Re:Mobius [Hope Renewed] — 210 BPM · 439pp
↳ Tapping ?
↳ Bursts ?
Accuracy77
Confidence: Medium8 relevant plays · 8 strongTrend: 80 → 77
Measured: 97.70% weighted accuracy
Estimated how: pp-weighted average accuracy of your plays, scaled 90% → 0 and 100% → 100.
Counts as evidence: every play.
Limits: Doesn't know the map's OD; 98% on OD10 is harder than 98% on OD8.
Plays that weigh most:
- I'll Sleep When I'm Dead [Onlybiscuit's Extreme] — 98.44% · 531pp
- You Suck At Love (Nightcore & Cut Ver.) [Ram's Extra] — 98.18% · 530pp
- -ERROR [*@#*%] — 98.92% · 500pp
- Manima ni [('(oo)')] — 98.34% · 496pp
- Re:Mobius [Hope Renewed] — 99.22% · 439pp
↳ Timing ?
Stamina ?24
Confidence: Low3 relevant plays · 3 strongTrend: 32 → 24
Measured: 2m 12s weighted drain length
Estimated how: pp-weighted average drain time of your plays after rate mods, scaled 1 min → 0 and 6 min → 100.
Counts as evidence: plays with 3+ minutes of drain time.
Limits: Length isn't density: a 5-minute map can be mostly breaks.
Too few relevant plays to judge this skill — it may just mean you haven't played many maps like that.
Plays that weigh most:
- -ERROR [*@#*%] — 3:43 drain · 500pp
- Re:Mobius [Hope Renewed] — 4:00 drain · 439pp
- Sunglow [Daydream] — 3:22 drain · 426pp
↳ Streams ?
Reading50
Confidence: Medium7 relevant plays · 7 strongTrend: 46 → 50
Measured: AR 10.2 effective · 40% HD
Estimated how: Distance of effective AR from the comfortable ~9.3 (both low and high AR are reading tests) plus the share of Hidden plays.
Counts as evidence: plays at AR 9.7+, AR 8.5 or lower, or with Hidden.
Limits: Can't see pattern complexity, only AR and Hidden.
Plays that weigh most:
- I'll Sleep When I'm Dead [Onlybiscuit's Extreme] — AR 10.5 HD · 531pp
- You Suck At Love (Nightcore & Cut Ver.) [Ram's Extra] — AR 10.5 HD · 530pp
- -ERROR [*@#*%] — AR 9.7 · 500pp
- Manima ni [('(oo)')] — AR 10.3 · 496pp
- Zetsubou plantation (Cut Ver.) [Reform's Extra] — AR 10.5 · 430pp
↳ Reading ?
Consistency38
Confidence: Medium8 relevant plays · 8 strongTrend: 30 → 38
Measured: 27% FC (weighted) · 2.9 misses avg
Estimated how: pp-weighted share of full combos (70%) and weighted average misses (30%, 8+ misses → 0).
Counts as evidence: every play.
Limits: Weighted towards a player's best runs, so it overstates day-to-day consistency.
Plays that weigh most:
- I'll Sleep When I'm Dead [Onlybiscuit's Extreme] — 1 miss · 531pp
- You Suck At Love (Nightcore & Cut Ver.) [Ram's Extra] — FC · 530pp
- -ERROR [*@#*%] — 4 misses · 500pp
- Manima ni [('(oo)')] — FC · 496pp
- Re:Mobius [Hope Renewed] — 5 misses · 439pp
↳ Miss rate ?
↳ Steadiness ?
DTHD 40%DT 35%NM 26%
Estimates from observable score data, not measurements of ability. History since 2026-09-29. High: 15+ relevant plays among your 50 strongest plays. Medium: 6–14. Low: fewer — the number may just mean you haven't played that kind of map. Methodology